Chatting dengan Staf :. Pilih Bahasa :. Teknik Informatika. Sebelumnya Adobe Photoshop Album. Adobe Photoshop Express Berikutnya. Adobe Photoshop Elements 7. Raster graphics editor. Commercial proprietary software. September [ 3 ]. September [ 4 ].
Maksud dan Tujuan. Pendaftaran Mhs Baru. Pengajuan Beasiswa. Letak Kampus PTS. Jaringan Web Program Reguler. We are continually making additional tools and information available online in order to provide you with flexible options for resolving issues as fast as possible. Adobe User Groups. Adobe Marketplace and Exchange. Adobe Certification Program. Adobe Partner Programs.
Find an Adobe Authorized Training Center. Legal Notices Online Privacy Policy. Photoshop Elements 11 release notes Search. Adobe Photoshop Elements Read Me. Install Photoshop Elements with an account that has administrative privileges not a Limited User Account if you are using Vista.
For the easiest installation experience, quit any open programs, including virus protection software, prior to installing Photoshop Elements Remember to re-enable virus protection once you have successfully installed the product. In some cases regions , the installer files are installed to the Program Files folder; on Vista, the actual installed location is the Programs folder.
For non-English languages, the name of the folder may differ, for example, Programme in the German language. You can't use the healing brushes. This is not possible with PSE 10 which make the software less useful for persons working with scanned film material in full resolution.
On a Mac Elements 10 has a problem in Organizer. The time stamp for photos taken for all ohotos is one hour earlier than it should be. If you then edit a photo the time stamp gets reduced by a further hour!
To me, that makes Elements useless as an Organizer if you run it on a Mac. The problem has existed since at least the release date of Elements 10 and Adobe know about it. I'm trying Elements 11 right now and right away I found something that doesn't work, Unsharp Mask It's so broken it is a joke.
The preview button most of the time doesn't show the on screen image preview. The small window within the tool itself often doesn't show any changes and sometimes it will show changes but on half of the Window.
Is this a joke?! Good Lord, is any software provider today capable of putting out software where the most obvious and basic things work as they are supposed to?! Update: I can only get the preview option to work if I close the tool and open it again. If I make another adjustment then preview doesn't work. The small window within the tool also breaks. Amazing that stuff like this makes it to market.
I think I will stay with Elements It does fine for me so why change or upgrade, unless, of course, its absolutely necessary. I switched from 8 to 10 only because of the RAW editing feature for the Olympus E-P3, which was not available in version 8. Perhaps I'm old school, but I don't understand why they incorporate an organizer. That's just me I guess.
Why, when loading the program, don't they provide the option for selecting or deselecting the organizer. Like I said, that's me. I agree about the organizer I use PSE 10 but ignore the Organizer. It's not just you. I had my own organization schemes highly organized years before Adobe started shoving their own ideas down people's throats.
I even wrote a program to automate it for me. Been using my own scheme for years, and can find albums 15 years old within a few seconds. Like inohuri I would not spend the price for PS. Adobe line their pockets selling upgrades to gullible customers mostly by adding bells and whistles.
Forget them and learn ALL you can with what you already have. The GUI has become too busy, less space for the image you want to edit where CS2 is streamlined, neat and tidy. Its tonemapping is superb even from a single frame and it is lightning fast so adjustments are hugely easier than anything else. Tonemapping is very intuitive and often the results are amazing even from single RAW. PC only, not MAC. It will not align properly but there is a no-cost solution.
Use the Photomatix Pro trial version and save HDR 32 bit as it is very good on ghost removal automatically or manually - you choose which. Just be sure when you start a project you check to say you want to save an HDR before mapping and stop there.
It looks awful when you get there before saving but only because the monitor image is not 32 bit or tonemapped. To tout something like a brighter background is to admit defeat. It's ; any software company, especially one providing software widely used by imaging professionals, not only shouldn't waver between drastically different interface design, but also shouldn't make the interface static; allow the user to choose their own background color, their own icon layout, etc.
Not to mention increasingly cumbersome pricing policies which are now edging out new users, amateur users, and those with either no need or without ongoing means to learn the system. I think Adobe makes great software, and at this point they're lucky they have a relative monopoly on the "creative suite" market.
All I want now is a manual that explains the software!! Use Lightroom as your organizer and [absolutely killer] RAW converter and you can then easily jump from LR to PSE with images that you want to do deeper editing with layers, etc. This gets you an amazingly solid workflow, stellar RAW processing, and a powerful advanced editor for a fraction of what the full Photoshop CS costs.
Use Elements as your organiser and Lightroom as your editor. This gives you the best hierarchical photo organiser on the market and avoids Lightroom's flat file keyword only structure, which is a mess at best and a real blast from the past.
And like you say you get the best editor in Lightroom. My choice as well. The two provide a wide range of options if needed or a quick fix if things look good to begin with. Another great combo is Aperture and Pixelmator. I've been using elements 8 for some time now for my 40D raw files. I need to get familiar with this now but also want to have elements for further editing layers etc.
Which version should I buy? Which is best do you think? I'm not so sure about the look of the new layout of Maybe it's better but a quite a change from what I'm used to on v8. Content aware delete from full PS is so useful, especially to hobbyist photographers.
These users seem more likely to buy Elements than full PS, so why doesn't Adobe put it into the basic version? It then can save it only to a DNG file format. To save in image formats you open the file in the editor and save it there. What Conchita is saying if I dare speak forConchita is to open in raw, make changes or not and then have the raw file open in elements editor and then you can save in any format available to Elements. At least that is how it worked in Elements 10 and all the ones before Curt on Cape Cod.
Thank you Conchita and curtmill What I should have done is after opening my CR2 file in Raw 7. Version 11 looks good, but my main problem with Photoshop Elements has always been the number of broken files it produces. There are few worse editing experiences than spending a considerable time on a picture only for its Photoshop file to 'break', leaving you with nothing but your SD card original.
I'd need to hear evidence that Adobe have cracked this problem before I buy back into Photoshp Elements. At the moment I'm in market and considering my options. Upgrading to Apple is one. I have been using Photoshop Elements 9 on my MacBook Pro for almost two years now and I haven't got a single broken file so far.
Yes, in the limited Elements form only basic and details tabs and a much abbreviated version of the profiles tab. I used to be a user of Serif Photoplus, which is very PS like, including nested layers.
But it was unusably buggy with bugs stretching back over 10 years of versions on basic things, with a batch processing that does not allow changing adobe plugin settings from their defaults?!?!?!?
Plus the curves implementation is primitive. I gave up. I have used PS, but in my private capacity I prefer to avoid piracy and so use Irfanview with the smartcurves plugin.
It's very much a poor man's solution. Smartcurves is good, including white, grey and black point droppers, but it's all 8bit which has the potential for posterisation on the more extreme adjustments. I use Gimp for editing, which also 8bit. I know Elements can't include all of the Photoshop features, it's just too bad because bit TIFF support is the only thing, for me anyway, that it's missing. I don't understand what is meant by "support" here. As a newbie, I have a question.
I have Aperture, Lightroom 4 and Elements Can Elements 11 now replace them all? Aperture and Lightroom are photographer's storage, organizing, and developing tools that feature non-destructive RAW workflow. Photoshop full program and PS Elements are graphics programs. Graphics programs are built from the ground up as compositors. There is some overlap, but they are very different programs.
Most photographers use some kind of DAM, and some kind of editor. Since you have Aperture, you must have a Mac. Since you have a Mac, you should -- imho -- use Aperture, upgrade to PSE 11 if you find the need for it, and set PSE as your external editor set at Aperture preferences. I understand, that is kind of the way I work. However, you are the first person I have heard that says a Mac user should use Aperture. Is there a reason for this?
I thought Lightroom was universally considered superior. Can you tell me why you think a Mac user should use Aperture instead of Lightroom? Aperture does seem to have less of an impact on my system and that is saying a lot considering what I have. So now, the question is, how to I ensure everything from Lightroom is now in Aperture if I go that route?
In all seriousness -- if Adobe Lightroom is bringing an Intel i7 with 16 gigs of ram "to its knees" -- then you've got some other rather serious problem going on with your system. I don't agree that a Mac person should necessarily use Aperture.
Lightroom has often supported Mac users first and better, via camera support, bit support, etc. I use LR because it supported my Mac hardware back at a time when Aperture refused to.
There were some stats that said Lightroom is outselline Aperture even on the Mac's home turf platform alone. As to the original question, whether Elements 11 replaces the other three depends on what you need to do. Elements 11 can't replace everything all the other software does, but it might be able to replace all the other software for the specific list of things you need to do. I'll kick the tire of 11 and see how it goes I agree with that, as a computer tech.
The first thing you should then do when connecting to the internet is "system updates" and the second is download and install anti-virus Avast! After that make sure all programs that require updates do their update AND are confirgured to do so automatically. Adobe reader needs updates. I have been a System Administrator for several years and have never seen anything like this.
I have wiped this system and all software is set to update automatically. This behavior is not normal. I was talking to a friend last night - another System Administrator and Apple convert - and we associate this with Honda Accords: they are supposed to be reliable and you are almost hurt when they are not. Does anyone know if PSE 11 has a clone tool to remove e. Lots of great advice being given here.
To be honest, as a newbie, you may not even notice the differences between Aperture and Lightroom until you've worked with either one extensively. They both produce great results, but regardless you'll eventually want an external editor for more advanced effects. My advice would be to pick a path Aperture or Lightroom and just go with it. Neither one is a bad choice. Currently I use Aperture because of my workflow. Has PSE11 an antialiased downsampled graphics display now?
PSE10 has not. When I zoom out of a noisy image, then artifacts are generated and the noise is not downsampled.
0コメント